Photos: 

Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com.

Country/Region

This evaluation contributes to the debate around the OCB Martissant intervention following the proposed closure and resulting decision to scale down in 2013. The report concludes that the context remains similar to that of the beginning therefore the intervention is still as relevant as it was in 2006 however the evaluation questions the suitability of OCB's country wide strategy in Haiti, urging a focus towards the most vulnerable and marginalised urban populations, rather than towards the general needs of the population.

Stockholm Evaluation Unit
23/09/2013

In the last decade, while facing increasingly complex “projects”, MSF-OCP has chosen to add means to improve its interventions. This results in the actual growth syndrome of MSF-OCP HQ departments, which is also significantly impacting country coordination (CC) set-ups and means. New scenarios should be tested, notably for mono-projects (to revise), the idea being to reduce CC set-ups whenever possible. Resources' analyses highlight the importance of competent persons to follow (coordinators & key positions), including PCs, with a clearer career path.

Marie‐Laure Le Coconnier
01/08/2013

This report summarises the key lessons learned from MSF's cholera interventions in Zambia 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010 (OCBA), Guinea Bissau 2005-2008 (OCBA), Juba 2006 (OCBA), Haiti 2010-2011 (OCBA), Angola 2006 (OCB, OCA, OCBA), Zimbabwe 2009 (OCB, OCA, OCBA)

M Iscla
09/05/2012

After the 12 January 2010 earthquake in Port-au-Prince, 4 MSF sections (OCG, OCA, OCP and OCB) decided to build container hospitals to respond to the health care needs (including Léogâne). All of these prefabricated structures, though varying in quality, were unique in that they were partially or completely built from modular containers (with different architectural designs). Construction was done by subcontractors, MSF teams trained in construction, or a combination of the two.

Monique Lathelize, Marie-Laure Le Coconnier, Julien Bégou
02/02/2012

- L’évaluation technique demandée par les ROL (Resp Opés Log) de 5 OCs MSF a permis de capitaliser sur une liste de produits pertinents/construction de la conception à la réalisation. Les projets MSF ont tous abouti (ça marche !), mais un Comité de Projet permanent doit garantir le suivi de projets aussi ambitieux. - La réalisation en urgence pour certains (6 à 8 mois) doit être modulée en fonction des exigences de qualité, projet à moyen terme (3 à 5 ans). - L’utilisation de conteneurs est pertinente en post-séisme, mais la durabilité des matériaux reste un facteur à prendre en compte.

FPENFEUNTEUN
02/02/2012

This evaluation aimed at gaining perspective on and learning from current partnership practices, informing the debate on MSF’s policy on partnerships and providing guidance for future engagement. Four separate field evaluations in DRC, Kenya, Niger and North Korea as well as a desk review of seven additional partnerships have been conducted. The report provides good practice examples and practical recommendations.

Karima Hammadi and Annie Désilets
01/02/2012

L’analyse montre un équilibre encore fragile pour divers volets des projets (RH, qualité/standards souhaités, intégration éventuelle, etc …avant d’envisager des scénarios « à terme » avec le Min. Santé. Une vision à distance est nécessaire, avec des étapes à préciser.

FPENFEUNTEUN
24/01/2012

In CAR, MSF’s medical presence finds itself unprecedentedly in the midst of a health desert. MSF intervenes in CAR to provide access to health to populations affected by the conflict in the North. Within this context, 3 MSF sections (MSF-OCBA, OCA, OCP) in CAR since 2006 requested an evaluation of their hospital-based projects. This work involves the comparison of the three projects (hospital + outreach activities) and the analysis of factors in the face of a potential handover to the MoH or other actors present in the area.

Isabelle Voiret and Vincent Brown
20/12/2011

The analysis shows a still fragile equilibrium for several components of these projects: HR, Quality Standards expected, possibilities of integration in RCA etc. Before imagining handover scenarios with the MOH and/or others actors, MSF needs to take a longer term view and define carefully the steps.

Isabelle Voiret, Vincent Brown
01/12/2011

Pages